• Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

Suppliers And Iav

Do you take Polls?


  • Total voters
    21

Gas-Powered Awesome

Elio Addict
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
837
Reaction score
2,603
Location
..
My reservation number is lower than Past Fanatic's, Hightech's, and others, and you don't see me whining and gnashing my teeth. :cool:

I read the reservation agreement before I committed. I knew the promised timeline was sheer fantasy and said so many times. I know that 90%+ of all startups fail. I know that in the last 100 years only one new car company has gone into regular production. Anybody who didn't realize all of these things before they put their money down didn't do their homework and has nobody to blame but themselves.

The whiners should choose either to get a grip or write-off their reservation and move on. They'll be much happier.
 

JEBar

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
7,348
Reaction score
18,161
Location
Wake County, NC
Anybody who didn't realize all of these things before they put their money down didn't do their homework and has nobody to blame but themselves.

The whiners should choose either to get a grip or write-off their reservation and move on. They'll be much happier.

comment understood and I agree .... I don't know any of us who have been pleased at any of the delays .... its good to see that only a few seem to feel that throwing a tantrum is appropriate
 

Rickb

Elio Addict
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
7,152
Reaction score
13,997
to me its easy to understand their frustration .... knowing full well that this is an independent forum with no active members who work for EM, what's not so easy to understand is why they feel obliged to vent their frustrations here by raising both legitimate as well as deliberately contrived grievances here .... to accomplish anything they need to get EM's attention which can be done through EM's website, Facebook or a few other avenues .... one classic response to that question is for them to report to have have behaved in such a manner that they have been banned from EM's sites .... so for some reason they bring that same type behavior here .... I have no problem with anyone raising legitimate questions but do have a problem with those who do so in a manner that will take away from folks who come here for positive reasons
I too have a personal problem with contrived grievences or trolling just to stir up members for sport, but raising legitimate issues that remind us of EM's marketing history or actual statements made is ok for me personally. I prefer positive outlook and conversation as well. What I really prefer is a positive OUTCOME in 2016.
 

pistonboy

Elio Addict
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
4,334
Location
CA
Actually we know that EM had funding agreements lined up, via a previous private placement, however these funding deals collapsed when EM failed to secure the plant in a timely manner as it took about nine months longer than originally expected for IRG to secure the plant lease. That nine month delay in securing the plant was also the direct cause of all the delays previous to the one last month as EM was not able to give a new production estimate until after they secured the plant in May 2014.

The indirect effects of the plant delay and losing the funding deals is still being felt by EM and had a hand in delay announced last month. To get to the point where the new private placement could be sold there are a number of hoops that must be jumped through, including seed money, setting up the placement and a 90-day due diligence waiting period, This all resulted in the fact that the new private placement could not be sold until January.
Goofyone. Have you heard anything about progress on funding? There was a post recently saying progress was happening but I have not heard anymore.
 

pistonboy

Elio Addict
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
4,334
Location
CA
I recall hearing that IAV had been the ones writing the Tech Talk for a while; noticing that the recent Tech Talks have been nothing but fluff I am assuming IAV is no longer writing them (???).

So, just for fun I went ahead and contacted each of the suppliers (which seems to have shrunk). I simply asked how the Elio project has been going, here are a snip-it of their replies (I will update as more come in):



CooperStandard: Sorry, can you be more specific on your request? Cooper Standard is an Auto Supplier

Guardian Industries: Thank you getting in touch with us, Guardian Industries Corp. is a global leader in the glass and automotive industries. We suspect we may not be the company you are trying to reach.

Eastern Catalytic: Eastern has the honor of supplying exhaust system for Elio Motors. All other inquires should be directed to Elio Motors.


<Other Suppliers will go here once receive contact back>
No other updates; will most likely not get any updates till Monday [next business day]
You got these type of responses because of your poor writing skills. If you could write properly, you may have gotten better results.
 

John Painter

Elio Addict
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
1,435
Reaction score
5,188
Location
Lewiston, Maine
I would bet the farm the suppliers are under a gag order about the Elio.

That's what she said.

Squirrel!
squirrels140127_250.jpg
 

goofyone

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
18,664
Location
Cumming, GA
Goofyone. Have you heard anything about progress on funding? There was a post recently saying progress was happening but I have not heard anymore.

The EM scuttlebutt pretty much matches up with that post; there has been progress made on funding however no specifics available. Personally I am hoping that positive funding news in being worked into the rescheduled engine unveiling event.
 

Past Fanatic

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
100
Reaction score
32
Location
Florida
just curious, has it occurred to you that EM just might have some pretty good attorneys and engineers working on the ATVM loan application ...
Sure hope they are DIFFERENT than the ones that FAILED to get the $260 million ATVM loan.... back in 2010.
The key is "without the receipt of additional"........... I would say the ATVM loan is not counted in the "Federal funding " as you seem to think.

"Projects must be “financially viable without the receipt of additional Federal funding associated with the proposed project”
CRF 611.100(d)
(d) . For purposes of making a determination under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, additional Federal funding includes any loan, grant, guarantee, insurance, payment, rebate, subsidy, credit, tax benefit, or any other form of direct or indirect assistance from the Federal government, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, other than the proceeds of a loan approved under this Part, that is, or is expected to be made available with respect to, the project for which the loan is sought under this Part.
So you appear to be wrong on that part.
............................................................
You left out key parts
I. GENERAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

ATVM Program loans may be made to eligible applicants to finance the cost of (i) reequipping, expanding, or establishing manufacturing facilities in the United States to produce ATVs or qualifying components or (ii) engineering integration performed in the United States of ATVs or qualifying components. This Section I describes (1) technical eligibility requirements for ATVs/qualifying components , (2) technical eligibility requirements for applicants, (3) financial eligibility requirements for applicants, and (4) technical eligibility requirements for project costs.

The next key word is "designed"
1. "Technical eligibility requirements for ATVS/Qualifying components [10 CFR 611.2; 611.3]:
(b) Ultra efficient vehicle (defined as fully closed compartment vehicle designed to carry at least two (2) adult passengers that achieves either (x) at least 75 miles per gallon while operating on gasoline or diesel fuel or (y) at least 75 miles per gallon equivalent while operating as a hybrid electric - gasoline or eletric - diesel vehicle or (z) at least 75 miles per gallon equivalent while operating as a fully electric vehicle)
................................................................
I realize that you are upset that your capital has been tied up so long, but don't cut off your nose to spite your face.
I'm sure you will find people working for EM who are good lawyers and accountants.
Perhaps, but Elio Motors has to show they have sufficient 'additional' funding (over and above the ATVM loan), and Paul Elio, himself said last Aug that the "E" Series build was put on HOLD, due to "FUNDING". They couldn't even build the FIRST of "18 to 26" vehicles that they have said are "needed to finalize the design".
Yes, it is "designed" to carry at least two adult passengers; but the 'operable phrase' is "that achieves" at least 75 miles per gallon, not "designed to achieve"..... very different.
.... Also, the ATVM does accept computer simulations and those results as proof of concept!....
Please cite your source.
to me its easy to understand their frustration .... knowing full well that this is an independent forum with no active members who work for EM, what's not so easy to understand is why they feel obliged to vent their frustrations here by raising both legitimate as well as deliberately contrived grievances here .... to accomplish anything they need to get EM's attention which can be done through EM's website, Facebook or a few other avenues .... one classic response to that question is for them to report to have have behaved in such a manner that they have been banned from EM's sites .... so for some reason they bring that same type behavior here .... I have no problem with anyone raising legitimate questions but do have a problem with those who do so in a manner that will take away from folks who come here for positive reasons
There is nowhere in the FaceBook "Terms and Conditions" that you have to maintain a 'Positive Outlook', I did not violate ANY of their guidelines, I only asked QUESTIONS that Elio Motors 'could not' or 'did not want to answer'..... they just IGNORED them, or [Deleted] them. When I was persistent, and re-asked the questions (noting that they had failed to answer them the first time).... they AGAIN [Deleted] them and BLOCKED me, without notification, or citing any 'violation' or reason. NOT the 'transparency' you would expect from a company that claims it is one on their "core values". When I contacted "tellmemore" to get a reason (since I was 'Blocked' from messaging Elio Motors on FaceBook), their response was; "We don't know the particulars [Problem Solved]. When I responded, that I did not consider it 'Solved', and would they check into it...... NO FURTHER reply from them. Those are the kinds of people representing Elio Motors.... and after many years of support..... I no longer respect or believe them!
 
Top Bottom