• Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

Govts Should Subsidize Elio, Not Tesla Vehicles

ArthurKent

Elio Aficionado
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
69
Reaction score
237
I use carbon emissions here, not because I believe them to be especially important, but because 1) they are easy to work with, and 2) others (govts) think they are important.
Fuel facts :
U.S. average equals roughly 22 ounces CO2 per kWhr of electric power consumed (net, at the wall).
Gasoline combustion in a modern fuel injected engine produces roughly 310 ounces of CO2 per gallon.
Car facts :
The Tesla Model S gets roughly 2.4 miles per kWhr, town, 2 miles per kWhr Interstate highway travel, due to the fact that its 85 kWhr battery requires 100 kWhrs of electricity to fully charge (15% loss due to heating), and highway range averages roughly 200 miles and around-town averages roughly 240 miles.
The Elio gets 49 mpg city, 84 mpg highway.
Conclusions:
The Tesla Model S is responsible for 9.1 ounces CO2 per mile, town, 11 ounces per mile Interstate highway.
The Elio emits 6.3 ounces CO2 per mile town, 3.7 ounces per mile highway.
The Tesla produces more than three times the carbon emissions than the Elio on the highway, and at least 50% more around town.
These are actually optimistic figures for the Tesla, since it uses electricity at all times to maintain the temperature of its water cooled battery pack. There is also an unknown (but small) amount of
battery leakage, or loss of charge over time.
In terms of oil consumption,the Tesla can eliminate all of the oil consumed as gasoline by the car it replaces, while the Elio can eliminate half of the average car's gasoline consumption, since it
gets at least twice the mileage of the (average) car it replaces.
The Tesla Model S receives large Federal and state subsidies : $7500 tax break from the Feds, and a sliding amount from California,which forces automakers who are not producing electric cars to pay Tesla for each car it produces.
Results on a per dollar spent basis.
The above results are on a car-to-car basis. But govt subsidies have a goal of emission reduction and it is appropriate to judge their effect, not on a car to car basis, but on a dollar spent basis - how much emission reduction will result from each dollar spent subsidizing an Elio versus a Tesla Model S?
The Elio we will assume costs $7000. The Tesla Model S we know costs between $77,000 and well over a $100,000, so let's say the Tesla costs between 11 and 15 times more than an Elio. Therefore,for each dollar of subsidy, the govt can achieve 33 to 45 times more carbon emission reductions, highway,and between 6 and 8 times more, city, and 5.5 to 7.5 times greater oil reductions subsidizing Elio cars instead of Tesla Model S vehicles.
The govts also allow Tesla owners to avoid all road taxes, despite the fact that their cars(4700 pounds) will probably inflict four times the damage to our roads than the 1200 pound Elio.
 

elio_curious

Elio Aficionado
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
68
Reaction score
113
Yes the Elio looks great if you only look at the CO2 output. I think there have been other threads addressing why Elio doesn't want to go with the Feds for financing.

It's going to be a tricky thing for the Feds to figure out how to tax Telsas like gas cars are taxed via fuel taxes. Maybe by using the "average" gas cars' taxes per mile or something, I dunno.

Also as more solar and wind power plants are built, it will slowly change the USA's CO2 per KWh output. There is also the way gasoline is produced and the waste, pollution, cost of transportation, and politics involved with that process to consider.
 

DScott

Elio Addict
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
191
Reaction score
496
I can totally understand that Elio wants nothing to do with the feds. the reason the govmt wouldn't want to subsidize fuel efficient vehicles is because it goes against their agreements with our oil producing "allies". yes, I"m saying they are paid by the middle east to keep us oil dependent.
 

Craig

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
1,849
Reaction score
4,062
Location
SE OHIO
I use carbon emissions here, not because I believe them to be especially important, but because 1) they are easy to work with, and 2) others (govts) think they are important. :

If you can find subsidies below, I'm all for it. Other wise, go pound sand.o_O

Article 1, Section 8

Clause 1. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Clause 2. To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
Congress is allowed to go into debt to pay for government programs and services. Deficit spending by the government was fairly rare in peacetime through much of American history, but has been quite common in recent decades.

Clause 3. To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

Clause 4. To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

Clause 5. To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

Clause 6. To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

Clause 7.To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

Clause 8. To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
.
Clause 9. To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

Clause 10. To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

Clause 11. To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Clause 12. To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

Clause 13. To provide and maintain a Navy;

Clause 14. To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

Clause 15. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Clause 16. To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Clause 17. To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;

--And
Congress has the power to set up a national capital of the United States that is outside the jurisdiction of any state. (Congress used this power to create Washington, DC, on swampland along the Potomac River that was originally part of Maryland.) Congress also has ultimate authority over all federal military facilities, even if they're located within particular states. And that "--And" means were getting almost to the end of this long list of Congress's enumerated powers.

Clause 18. To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom