Has anyone heard anything about how the new engine is testing? I keep searching online. I have not found anything yet. Honestly, I still have reservations that 84 mpg (highway) is possible from an engine that doesn't use any newer technologies like turbo. Based on other vehicles of similar weight and similar designed aspirated engines - that mpg is not possible. For example;
Tata Nano
weight: 1350lbs, Engine: 624cc / 2 cylinder / gasoline, and it gets 62 mpg on the highway.
Keep in mind the Tata Nano engine would not pass US EPA standards. If all the added emission equipment is connected to that engine I doubt 62 mpg is possible. I understand that Elio's biggest argument is the body design cuts the air at higher speeds. Elio is not the first design with 2 wheels in the front and one in the back. Check out www.3wheelers.com they have a whole data base of them for the last 125 years. To me, the Fiat Twinair 900cc engine seems the most promising to reach the 84 goal. Search for International Engine of the Year for more on that. Let me know what you think. -Joe K.
Hey Mr. Kidd if I missed welcoming you aboard before, I do so now! Welcome to the Elio family! It's a pity the Tata Nano is not being produced with lower emissions, as India is a country that needs to raise their standards to help reduce their air pollution problem within the cities. Then again the idea behind the vehicle is to get some of the motorcycles with 3-5 passengers off the road and offer a safer mode of transportation to families at a reasonable cost.First Post, sorry.
					
				
  Remember the Chrysler K-cars circa 1981?  They used tiny turbos to get better economy while trying to not be completely gutless.   The 1980's was really the heyday of turbos in broad use, though unfortunately the engine management wasn't far enough along yet.  This current revival will be something now that we have much better computers to design and control the turbos.