• Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

Where Did 84 Mpg Come From?

AltoidBox

Elio Aficionado
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
76
Reaction score
123
Location
Maineville, OH
The Team already has a problem w/the 84 # because Elio will NOT do that is city driving, the # that really counts.

The side window placard on my Insight is 40 city 43 highway, but can do 64 (with a tailwind!), a # Honda knows not to advertise.

They will wind up in court if they put 84 on the placard and consumers are going to scream foul when it won't do
84 city and/or highway. But I don't see it doing 84 highway, either; I could be wrong.

They need to clarify what that # actually is, but at this stage may not.

They only expect/hope/intend to get 49 mpg in the city. See the specs section of the FAQ on their website.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

raybonz

Elio Addict
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Messages
527
Reaction score
689
So if it turns out that the only way to get 84 mpg is to increase the price to (say) $8,000 they should just scrap the whole mess and walk away?
Good point.. Seems that $6800.00 is unlikely unless they get great prices on parts and labor which I doubt.. If the price needs to be adjusted a bit and is justified I could understand that..
 

jtmarten

Elio Addict
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
282
Reaction score
371
They will wind up in court if they put 84 on the placard and consumers are going to scream foul when it won't do
84 city and/or highway. But I don't see it doing 84 highway, either; I could be wrong.

I doubt there's a vehicle out there that attains the claimed mfg or EPA fuel economy. They get their economy data by driving slower than real world speeds (whatever speed is the most efficient for the engine/trans/gearing setup), on a treadmill in an environment that is controlled (i.e. large test lab). No hills, wind, starts/stops, buffeting from other vehicles, etc.
There is no onus on the mfg for the vehicle to attain their claimed economy. If there were, every mfg would be continually sued for not meeting the claimed fuel economy.
 

jtmarten

Elio Addict
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
282
Reaction score
371
Good point.. Seems that $6800.00 is unlikely unless they get great prices on parts and labor which I doubt.. If the price needs to be adjusted a bit and is justified I could understand that..
They should get great cost to value on both. Most components are off the shelf parts; meaning no new, expensive design and tooling work.
Labor will be relatively cheap if they keep the unions out, and utilize lean mfg philosophy.
 

goofyone

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
18,664
Location
Cumming, GA
I doubt there's a vehicle out there that attains the claimed mfg or EPA fuel economy. They get their economy data by driving slower than real world speeds (whatever speed is the most efficient for the engine/trans/gearing setup), on a treadmill in an environment that is controlled (i.e. large test lab). No hills, wind, starts/stops, buffeting from other vehicles, etc.
There is no onus on the mfg for the vehicle to attain their claimed economy. If there were, every mfg would be continually sued for not meeting the claimed fuel economy.

The sticker number is only supposed to help you gauge the relative fuel economy of one vehicle vs another. The truth is that what the label says and what you get in the real world are two very different things. Vehicle manufacturers are supposed to follow a very strict test procedure to determine the fuel economy numbers you see on the window sticker. In the real world variations in temperature, terrain, traffic, winds, driver driving styles, and who knows what else make it nearly impossible for any manufacturer to tell you what your actual fuel economy will be.
 

Inigo93

Elio Addict
Joined
Mar 15, 2014
Messages
185
Reaction score
327
Good point.. Seems that $6800.00 is unlikely unless they get great prices on parts and labor which I doubt.. If the price needs to be adjusted a bit and is justified I could understand that..

As could I. However, that would mean that the $6800 is a "nice to have" not a "must have."
 

goofyone

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
18,664
Location
Cumming, GA
This is how I rate Elio Motors' four goals in order from greatest importance to least important:

1. Made in the USA
2. 5-Star Safety Rating
3. $6800 starting price
4. $84 MPG

If I were running this project I would sacrifice some MPG to achieve the other three goals and would also raise the price some if I needed to. I doubt changing either one of those two a small amount would affect sales projections much if at all.
I believe building the car outside the U.S. at this point would negatively change the entire perception of the company and wavering on the 5-star safety rating would likely lead to the masses being hesitant to purchase the car which is what you need to remain in business if you are selling this car at with very small profit margins.
 

goofyone

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
18,664
Location
Cumming, GA
4. 5-Star Safety Rating (use to be an EMT, seen rating vs real world)

Funny thing is that if not for the business marketing advantage I believe a 5-Star safety rating holds for such a small and light vehicle I would actually completely agree with you. Safety is frequently much more about perception than reality.
 

Craig

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
1,849
Reaction score
4,062
Location
SE OHIO
Funny thing is that if not for the business marketing advantage I believe a 5-Star safety rating holds for such a small and light vehicle I would actually completely agree with you. Safety is frequently much more about perception than reality.

Perception, in the case of the Elio, is 60% of the rating, I will give 20 to the seat belts and 20 to the air bags. JMO
 
Top Bottom