Maybe this is why they took the link off Facebook.
Jeff may have gotten a little carried away.
Also he [Johnston] made a colossal gaffe when explaining the requirement for a low-profile vehicle design. He completely omitted the necessity of a low drag coefficient.
[@17:34]
Q: "And how do you see this car as the industry and the consumers want higher vantage point - they want to sit up higher in vehicles. And you look at sedans - there's fewer and fewer interest in a car that's just kind of a car and low to the ground. How does this fit into that trend?"
A: "Well, you know, I don't know at the moment, Lindsay - I really couldn't answer ya. You know, there's a possibility that we could fit into that trend, but for right now, of course, we'll be in the sedan size. You know.. and whatnot...But our focus is; we gotta get this out - we gotta get it moving, ah, the whole team has been very, very passionate. We were online until midnight last night going over drawings and a few odds-and-ends stuff, so I mean, these guys are working around the clock with us."
[FACEPALM]
The correct answer is:
In order to achieve the 84 MPG target, we're compelled to minimize drag and rolling resistance. A good way to accomplish this is with a low and narrow design for the body. This is the reason for tandem seating and the low stance. Perhaps someday Elio Motors will build Six-thousand pound SUV's, but that's really not in the cards for us right now. [wink-wink]