Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!
You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.There are so few people looking here, maybe I can ask a question that won't upset too many people....
What channels of news do you watch for political information that you trust? I was never very political myself until 2016, and now only for my own and my wife's self direction.
Since then, I have learned sooo much about human nature and how information is manipulated and how tribalisum is integrated into the world as well as into the USA, frankly makes me a bit more cynical about the average behavior of humanity.
So without asking for direct political opinions, what do you watch?
For me, I now load up in youtube with Meidas Touch, The Ring of Fire, Brian Tyler Cohen, Glen Kirschner, Farron Balanced, The Bulwark. And that about fills up a half day every single day of a retiree like me. That admittedly automaticaly frames my orientation. I'm also learning the ins and outs of Legal maters in the USA that I never wished I knew.
So what do you watch? I consider this Elio Owners website chalk full of intelligent people, who like detailed understandings. So what you watch? I may consider lookimg at your information relms in my search for comprehension and balanced, honest data..
Just to be fully honest for myself, I seem to fit the label of a Social Democrat, which in current catgorizations pretty much is what mold the USA has been in since WWII, or A.K.A. a compromising pragmatic moderate who likes a democratic, compassionate and well managed national and world stage.
Respecfully say what you want, but for me just simply what sourses do you trust, and into what political catitigory does that fall?
Now as a back drop, and in my opinion, political karma will catch up to all of us sooner or later. So these sources of all of us, may predict for us all, how that 'drama' may work out toward our collective world karma.
If one plays Mozart poorly do you blame the composer?Another thing to keep in mind, is that all rules are imaginary and can not have any effect or stand if people all become irreverent about them.
It takes honest people to have an honest society.
But, in religion, certainly political-ish issues of truth, facts, and group think also come into play. How can you ever sort that all out if you simply depend on your own tribe to inform your oppinion? My answer is, do your own research with the comprehension that all people are imperfect. An all insitutions are run by people.
So about the religieous institutions, all of them speak to be true above the others. For me then it says all of them are suspect. Maybe not the phylosophy of any but the latest implementation and interpretation by leaders of each. I mean hey, Jim-Jones espoused Jesus all the time, until he had cult control, then pronouced himself as the ultimate authority of christ. Yea, I agree, choose wisely my friends.
Social evolution shows a pattern of power seekers eventually finding ways to exploit all apparently stable and just social systems. We do have to correct all those instances peacfully over time, or you end up like the French revolution. In that instance everyone claimed Jesus was on thier side. And each wave of 'correctors' killed off the prior power cast for around 100years, until a short time before the one after the 1799 version that gave Nepolian dicatory powers. And then even beyond that. The final modern French consitution was only set in 1958.
God may not be flawed, but people who speak of him (it, her, or them), certainly are.
I think a good test is, what does a person do when they think they can get away with it and nobody will know? Absolute power corrupts absolutely. A belief in an utimate power does keep a few of us in check, but not all. Appearently, not most of us.