wow, so many responses, love the enthusiastic group. To clarify a few things, I will still buy the Elio if its made. I understand both sides to this whole saga, and just wish we had better info. A small part of my might be comparing the experience with the purchase of the Slingshot. I heard about the slingshot, on 7/30/2014, put a deposit down the next day, and followed, still do, the slingshot forum like lunatic. Reach for my phone in the middle of the night to see new posts. Was told deliveries by end of Oct, and still nothing in Nov, BUT they kept us informed to progress. Finally received it in early Dec, only about a 45 day delay. Now granted Polaris is a 4 billion dollar company, and Elio is a start-up. So i am comparing apples to sour-grapes I guess.
I am sorry to hear you have given up on the Elio but I am glad you are enjoying your Slingshot and hope you continue to enjoy it for a long time.

I do however have to use your post to make a little bit of a point about production timelines and delays. Even with the resources Polaris has at their disposal it took years to develop the Slingshot and they still ended up delaying it's launch after waiting to unveil the vehicle until mere months before it was supposed to be released. As with most vehicle development as almost everything happened behind the scenes most delays in development or production were not a big deal to outsiders as not many people outside the company were following along.
If you search the internet and read some interviews from people involved in the Slingshot development you find that Polaris began playing with the idea of a Slingshot type vehicle about 2008 and by 2011 filed the first of a series of patents that year followed by more detailed patents in 2012. Even after having developed the vehicle to the point of filing patents which look just like the final vehicle it still took them until the end of 2014 to actually launch the vehicle. However from more reading you can find out that not only was there a last second production delay but the launch happened about a year and a half after the mid 2013 launch which Polaris had initially intended.
As a young start-up company EM just does not have the luxury that Polaris had in having the money available and being able to develop their vehicle behind closed doors. Also, unlike EM, Polaris was able to use their size to hide the fact that what some customers perceived as an annoying 45 day delay was actually just the last of a series of delays totaling about a year and half from the originally intended launch date at the end of a project which took six or more years from start to finish.
It would be nice if people could understand that delays in complex product development projects are very common and happen to everyone big or small regardless of funding levels so as such delays should be expected. This is also naturally compounded by the fact that as a start-up EM must also arrange for rounds of financing to complete various stages of development. Along with this any delays or issues they encounter which hamper, disrupt, and/or delay funding arrangements will simply lead to more project delays.