RUCRAYZE
Elio Addict
suffering from-"misella landica"?, think the spelling is correctThank you for your kind words. If I understand correctly, you think that my opinion that elio motors has taken money under false pretenses is either wrong or premature.
At some point, if/when the vehicle is actually offered for sale and a binding contract is signed, there should be clear specifications on that agreement. If those specs are not met at time of delivery, I think both of us agree that that would constitute a breach.
Projecting a little further, if, at the time the binding contract is offered, the then-current specs are different than the specs than were announced at the time the first non-refundable, non-binding agreement was signed, do you believe that at that point, there is a breach, or a mis-representation going back to the time of the reservation? I do not. If the vehicle makes it to the point of being offered for sale, either the reservationist accept the offer, or declines, and I'm good with that.
In my mind (a scary place, to be sure), either the problem exists now, because elio is aware that they have made, and are making false "promises", or it does not exist at all. If they really are doing the best they can, there is, or at least should be, no liability on their part. I believe any claim at the point the binding contract is offered and/or accepted would have to be based on elio's knowingly promising that the would not meet that promise. In my mind, that could/would apply, whether the discrepancy was price, performance, standard equipment of whatever. On a realistic basis, I don't think anyone would sue over $1-2K on the price, or 5-10mpg, but I could be wrong.
I apologize if that does not clearly express my thinking.