• Welcome to Elio Owners! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

The Elio Engine

Gas-Powered Awesome

Elio Addict
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
837
Reaction score
2,603
Location
..
I doubt Mr. Elio approached Nissan as the Elio's 3-cylinder engine has exact opposite goals from Nissan's.

If you were to detune it by making it a 1 liter, 100 horsepower engine, you would have effectively designed a completely new engine. Economy is largely dependent on things attached to the engine, and the laws of physics are not suggestions, so I expect economy would be the same as you get now from any other 1 liter, 100 horsepower engine.
 

Grumpy Cat

Elio Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
888
Reaction score
1,383
Location
WI
I happened to come across Nissan's astonishing 1.5 liter 3 cyl. engine, called DIG-T R that promises 400 hp from a block that weighs only 40 kg, and that was also covered in this thread. Did Paul Elio in fact approach them? I wonder what a tuned down version (say back to 1 liter and 100 hp) might mean for economy...
Just because something is detuned, doesn't necessarily make it more efficient. The Elio engine is purpose built for efficiency.
 

electroken

Elio Addict
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
335
Reaction score
789
Location
Shelton, Connecticut
I'm not a big fan of the term "detuned" as it implies the engine is diminished in some way.

I have a 2003 Kawasaki Concours, a motorcycle considered a sport-touring bike. The engine is a "detuned" variation of the Ninja 1000 engine of the late 1980s. It makes less peak horsepower than the Ninja, but has a far more useful torque curve. Not diminished, but instead optimized for the intended purpose.
 

Grumpy Cat

Elio Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
888
Reaction score
1,383
Location
WI
I'm not a big fan of the term "detuned" as it implies the engine is diminished in some way.

I have a 2003 Kawasaki Concours, a motorcycle considered a sport-touring bike. The engine is a "detuned" variation of the Ninja 1000 engine of the late 1980s. It makes less peak horsepower than the Ninja, but has a far more useful torque curve. Not diminished, but instead optimized for the intended purpose.
A few others examples of tuned engines as well:

LS1 (used in the Corvette, Camaro, CTS-v), guess which one makes the most power and the other 2 are detuned. ;)

The 2.3L I-4 for the Mustang and Focus RS. The Focus RS makes 350hp and 350 lbs ft of torque, the Mustang one, 300 HP. Though, technically speaking, the Mustang had it first and the Focus was tuned further.
 

CrimsonEclipse

Elio Addict
Joined
May 24, 2014
Messages
959
Reaction score
2,182
I think the term "detuned" is abused.
It's really a way to say "the same engine block with inexpensive components including heads, crankshaft, camshaft, pistons, etc etc etc"
 

BilgeRat

Elio Addict
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
637
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Northern Illinois
There's a lot to be said for building an engine to higher horsepower specifications, and then running it at a lower power output. I brought a new, 8000 hp boat out of the builders yard in 1999. Company "philosophy" was to run these two engines at 100%. Reality was that they ran at considerably more than this when the rudder angle passed 25-30 degrees. These engines had catastrophic failures on a regular basis (first major failure at 8,000 hours, and I had to take a cutting torch to the destroyed liner to remove it), had a "mid-overhaul" at 14,000 hours (cylinder heads, piston thrust washers, cams, valve gear) and a major overhaul at 28,000 hours (main and rod bearings, power assemblies, gear trains, turbo, water and oil pumps, etc.). Since 2009, I've been running a boat that operates on the upper end of the Illinois River. We typically run at something less than 75% of full load (most of the time) on 35 year old versions of the same engines. No mid-overhaul, and a time between overhauls of 55,000 hours, and a much less stressful life for the engineer (me!). There's real benefits to be had with even a 15-20% reduction in output as far as engine life goes.
 

Ty

Elio Addict
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
6,324
Reaction score
14,759
Location
Papillion, NE
There's a lot to be said for building an engine to higher horsepower specifications, and then running it at a lower power output. I brought a new, 8000 hp boat out of the builders yard in 1999. Company "philosophy" was to run these two engines at 100%. Reality was that they ran at considerably more than this when the rudder angle passed 25-30 degrees. These engines had catastrophic failures on a regular basis (first major failure at 8,000 hours, and I had to take a cutting torch to the destroyed liner to remove it), had a "mid-overhaul" at 14,000 hours (cylinder heads, piston thrust washers, cams, valve gear) and a major overhaul at 28,000 hours (main and rod bearings, power assemblies, gear trains, turbo, water and oil pumps, etc.). Since 2009, I've been running a boat that operates on the upper end of the Illinois River. We typically run at something less than 75% of full load (most of the time) on 35 year old versions of the same engines. No mid-overhaul, and a time between overhauls of 55,000 hours, and a much less stressful life for the engineer (me!). There's real benefits to be had with even a 15-20% reduction in output as far as engine life goes.
Cool view on things.

Power, efficiency, longevity. Pick any two. (Yeah, I kind of bastardized the original)
 
Top Bottom